We all find it hard to look in the mirror sometimes.
You know – during those moments of self-loathing where you've said something really stupid to someone, or made a really embarrassing mistake in front of your work colleagues, or killed your third hooker of the day and forgot to burn off her fingerprints before you buried her.
Imagine, then, if someone took a picture of you in a less-than-dignified moment and used it for a witty advertising campaign. That'd be pretty bloody annoying, right? And you know what would make it even more annoying – if you were the vagina-flashing hitmaker behind Oops I Did It Again, that's what.
A Florida radio station has been in a spot of bother with young Britney Spears and her lawyers, mainly due to the fact that they used a big picture of her during her recent snarly shaved-head phase for comical effect on a bunch of billboards. Which actually quite worries hecklerspray: if the lawyers are cracking down on people who find Britney's insanity hilarious, then we're pretty much up shit creek without a paddle. Or canoe. Or water wings.
The billboards apparently featured:
… three identical pictures of Spears, apparently snarling, next to radio station WFLZ's logo and a picture of talk show host Todd Schnitt. Along the top of each picture run the logos: "Total nut jobs," "Shock Therapy" and "Certifiable."
Britney's law firm were immediately on the case, sending out a stern letter demanding the billboards be taken down:
"Clear Channel was already exposed to substantial liability for its offensive, unauthorized commercial exploitation of my client's photograph on the billboards. Once again, we demand the immediate removal of the billboards, confirmed by documentary evidence and verified under penalty of perjury."
A bit of a misfire all round, really. Except, of course, for Britney Spears herself, who can now no doubt cruise around in her open-top, safe in the knowledge that she'll never be confronted by a gigantic image of her own mad bald head, become foam-mouthed at this chilling reminder of her lurking insanity and end up convulsing in the freeway fast lane while screaming schoolbuses crash into each other trying to avoid her. Or something.
And if – for some reason – everything gets repealed and the ad does go ahead? Maybe Britney could take solace in the fact that, however offensive she found the advert, it could never be as inherently wrong as this .
Seriously – what were you thinking, Creamsicle?
Read More:
flierpa says
eh… that creamsicle ad is very disturbing.
Phsyt says
i clicked on the “it could never be as inherently wrong as this” link….
i dropped my coffee in horror.
im now cleaning my temporary internet files as i feel dirty.
still worth looking at the main site tho.
amycakes says
Awww, poor thing. Crazy is as crazy does…isn’t that right Mr. Toaster. Oh he agrees. And as for the creamsicle ad, I’m ashamed to admit that I laughed just a tiny bit HYSTERICALLY. Ah me. Mr. Toaster thought the ad was in poor taste and I told him I though burning bagels was an offence to God, so we’re even.