<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hecklerspray &#187; Yes Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hecklerspray.com/tag/yes-man/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hecklerspray.com</link>
	<description>Grown Up Gossip &#38; Internet Villainy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Yes Man&#8217;s Weekend Box Office Success Attributed To Festive Drunkenness</title>
		<link>http://www.hecklerspray.com/yes-mans-weekend-box-office-success-attributed-to-festive-drunkenness/200818446.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.hecklerspray.com/yes-mans-weekend-box-office-success-attributed-to-festive-drunkenness/200818446.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Heritage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Carrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekend Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yes Man]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hecklerspray.com/?p=18446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, that headline hasn't been proved - Yes Man could have topped the weekend box office for any reason - but we're just being logical.

Actually, come to think of it again, we do know why Yes Man topped the weekend box office - nostalgia. A movie where Jim Carrey isn't blatantly gunning for an Oscar or playing a cackheaded number-obsessed maniac is a throwback to his golden age.

That means the weekend box office success of Yes Man sends a clear message to Jim Carrey - that message is 'Dance, monkey-boy, dance! Pull a funny face! Ha ha, look at stupid monkey-boy Jim Carrey's funny face!']]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://www.hecklerspray.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/yesman05.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-18447" title="weekend box office Yes Man Jim Carrey" src="http://www.hecklerspray.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/yesman05.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="153" /></a><strong>Actually, that headline hasn&#8217;t been proved &#8211; <em>Yes Man</em> could have topped the weekend box office for any reason &#8211; but we&#8217;re just being logical.</strong></p>
<p>Actually, come to think of it again, we do know why <em>Yes Man</em> topped the weekend box office &#8211; nostalgia. A movie where <strong>Jim Carrey</strong> isn&#8217;t blatantly gunning for an Oscar or playing a cackheaded number-obsessed maniac is a throwback to his golden age.</p>
<p>That means the weekend box office success of<em> Yes Man</em> sends a clear message to Jim Carrey &#8211; that message is &#8216;Dance, monkey-boy, dance! Pull a funny face! Ha ha, look at stupid monkey-boy Jim Carrey&#8217;s funny face!&#8217;</p>
<p><span id="more-18446"></span>The box office success of <em>Yes Man</em>, we&#8217;ll admit, is a bit of a shock. This is for two reasons: <strong>1)</strong> <strong>Will Smith</strong> had a new film out this weekend, and Will Smith films always enter the weekend box office at number one and<strong> 2) </strong>we didn&#8217;t expect that anyone would want to see <em>Yes Man </em>because you can pick up<em> Liar Liar</em> for pennies in the bargain bins of most DVD stores now and it&#8217;s THE EXACT SAME FILM.</p>
<p>But, still, if watery remakes of his former glories are what people want, then watery remakes of his former glories are exactly what Jim Carrey&#8217;s going to give them, starting next year with <em>The Number 73</em>, a remake of <em>The Number 23</em> where Jim Carrey becomes obsessed with the mid-1980s <strong>Sandi Toksvig</strong>-hosted ITV Saturday morning kid&#8217;s TV show and goes on a stab rampage. And it&#8217;ll be all your fault. Here&#8217;s the US weekend box office top five&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>1 &#8211; </strong><em>Yes Man</em> (Aside from being Jim Carrey&#8217;s biggest hit in forever, <em>Yes Man</em> also marks the start of <strong>Danny Wallace</strong>&#8216;s tenure as Hollywood hot property. We can now look forward to seeing the movie adaptations of his other books, such as <em>Join Me, Random Acts Of Kindness</em> and <em>Other Arbitrarily-Chosen Sunday Newspaper Magazine Feature Ideas Padded Out To Fill An Entire Godforsaken Paperback Stocking Filler</em>) <strong>$18,160,000</strong></p>
<p><strong>2 -</strong> <em>Seven Pounds</em> (Look at this &#8211; Will Smith&#8217;s first flop movie for as long as we can remember. What could have caused this? The vague premise? The way the title steals from <em>21 Grams</em> in an obscenely shameless way? Will Smith&#8217;s recent links with the Church Of Scientology? No. It&#8217;s the fact that Will Smith doesn&#8217;t rap the theme-tune. Will, if you&#8217;re reading, you have time to change this before the European release. And remember, &#8216;Seven Pounds&#8217; rhymes perfectly with both &#8216;release the hounds&#8217; and &#8216;I want to hump your sexy mounds.&#8217; Bill us accordingly, Will) <strong>$16,000,000</strong></p>
<p><strong>3 -</strong> <em>The Tale Of Despereaux</em> (&#8216;Despereaux&#8217; is, of course, the French for &#8216;Desperately ripping off <em>Ratatouille</em>&#8216;) <strong>$10,507,000</strong></p>
<p><strong>4 -</strong> <em>The Day The Earth Stood Still</em> (Slipping down the weekend box office because, gee, standing still is so boring. <em>The Day The Earth Did A Bodypop While Catching Peanuts In Its Mouth</em>? Now <em>that&#8217;s</em> a hit!) <strong>$10,150,000</strong></p>
<p><strong>5 -</strong> <em>Four Christmases</em> (Humbug) <strong>$7,745,000</strong></p>
<p><strong>Read more:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=1111X506827&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxofficemojo.com%2Fweekend%2Fchart%2F&sref=rss" target="_blank">Weekend Box Office &#8211; <em>Box Office Mojo</em></a></p>
<p><strong>You! <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=1111X506827&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fhecklerspray&sref=rss" target="_blank">Follow hecklerspray on Twitter</a>!</strong></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript">var sid=461;var vid=17963;</script><script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript" src="http://www.networkn3.com/scripts/vplay4-start-paused.js"></script>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="position: absolute; top: -46px; left: -65px; padding-bottom: 10px;">
			<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=1111X506827&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.tweetmeme.com%2Fshare%3Furl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.hecklerspray.com%252Fyes-mans-weekend-box-office-success-attributed-to-festive-drunkenness%252F200818446.php&sref=rss"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hecklerspray.com%2Fyes-mans-weekend-box-office-success-attributed-to-festive-drunkenness%2F200818446.php&amp;source=hecklerspray&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
		<div style="position: absolute; top: 20px; left: -65px;">
			<a class="DiggThisButton DiggMedium" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=1111X506827&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigg.com%2Fsubmit%3Furl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.hecklerspray.com%252Fyes-mans-weekend-box-office-success-attributed-to-festive-drunkenness%252F200818446.php%26title%3DYes%2BMan%2526%25238217%253Bs%2BWeekend%2BBox%2BOffice%2BSuccess%2BAttributed%2BTo%2BFestive%2BDrunkenness&sref=rss" ><span style="display:none">Actually, that headline hasn't been proved - Yes Man could have topped the weekend box office for any reason - but we're just being logical.

Actually, come to think of it again, we do know why Yes Man topped the weekend box office - nostalgia. A movie where Jim Carrey isn't blatantly gunning for an Oscar or playing a cackheaded number-obsessed maniac is a throwback to his golden age.

That means the weekend box office success of Yes Man sends a clear message to Jim Carrey - that message is 'Dance, monkey-boy, dance! Pull a funny face! Ha ha, look at stupid monkey-boy Jim Carrey's funny face!'</span></a>		
		</div>		
		]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hecklerspray.com/yes-mans-weekend-box-office-success-attributed-to-festive-drunkenness/200818446.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

