These days, you don’t really have to be talented to be famous. Look at Paris
Hilton. What has she ever done, ever? Wriggled about eating burgers and had sex all over the Internet, that’s what.

Despite all this ‘being famous for having sex’ nonsense, Paris Hilton
has said in an interview that she is in no way sexual. Which is a
shame, because once you remove her sexual part, she’s left with
absolutely no personality at all.

It’s very hard to say that you’re not sexual when pretty much your
entire career is built on a home video of you being, well, sexual. The
One Night In Paris sex video chiseled the image of Paris Hilton (books) the
sexy minx into the world’s mind. And now, she’s on the defensive. In an
interview with Vanity Fair magazine, Paris said:

"I think I’m sexual in pictures and the way I dress and my whole
image, but at home I’m really not like that. All of my ex-boyfriends -
of course, not Paris – would be like, ‘What’s the matter with you?
You’re so not sexual.’"

That’s her fiance Paris Latsis she’s talking about in the quote. She’s
not on some crazy third-person, being her own ex-boyfriend tip.

And anyway, does this "sexual in pictures but not at home" talk
include all those naked photos of her that were stolen from her mobile
a few months ago? If we carried around pictures of ourselves with our
nipples out on our phones, we’d consider ourselves to be pretty sexual.
And chronically weird, too.

It’s unlikely that Paris would have anything approaching a media career
if it wasn’t for her willingness to have it off on camera. And even she
made it to where she is now without the sex, what would she be famous
for? Being the dim one on The Simple Life or managing to be the worst
thing about House Of Wax – and trust us, being the worst thing in that
film takes some doing.

So, does this mean we’ll soon see Paris Hilton hitting the town in a
smart blouse and sensible shoes? We’ll believe it when we see it.

Read more:

Paris Isn’t Sexual – Sky Showbiz  

[story by Stuart Heritage]