Justin Timberlake Defends Britney’s Baby Photo Hoo-Ha

by Stuart Heritage on October 25, 2005 12 Comments

Britney_spears_justin_timberlake_baby_phIt’s turning into hecklerspray baby day, what with Gwynnie getting up the duff and Janet Jackson possibly hiding away her daughter for 18 years. But what about the most famous mother on the planet? Mother Nature? No, silly, we mean Britney Spears.

Britney got in a massive flap over the weekend over photos of her and her new baby Sean Preston that were allegedly stolen from a private photoshoot. All kinds of legal muscle was brought in to remove all trace of Sean Preston’s image from the Internet. And now Britney’s cavalry has arrived, in the high-pitched moonwalking form of Justin Timberlake.

This weekend, Britney Spears (CDs) got her legal representatives to send cease and desist letters to each individual website that dared show the stolen pictures of her with baby Sean Preston, threatening legal action to those who did not withdraw the images.

We managed to see one of the photos and we can report that – surprise, surprise – Sean Preston looks exactly like a baby. And babies are rubbish and boring anyway, so we can’t really understand what all the flap is for.

But Britney obviously needed someone to back her up. Seeing as how Sean Preston’s father Kevin Federline was probably too busy ramming $100 notes into a stripper’s knickers on a golf course somewhere, it was left to Britney’s ex, Justin Timberlake to step in and defend her. Speaking to Access Hollywood, he said:

"It’s a little crazy. When a
person like her, who’s obviously a sweet person, is having their first
child, it’s like, ‘leave the girl alone, let her have the baby!… I do think that’s crossing the line. That’s her baby and those are her baby pictures… At
some point, you’re going to know about her son and get to see a
picture. These magazines work week-to-week, so I don’t
understand why people can’t wait. Wait a week when she’s comfortable
putting it out, that’s her family!"

[story by Stuart Heritage]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

Roy Pont. October 25, 2005 at 6:44 pm

What a load of shit

Reply

ColdFire October 25, 2005 at 6:46 pm

SHE IS JUST CRAZY WHAT IS A BIG DEAL ABOUT YOUR SON’S PHOTO. YOU SHOW YOUR ENTIRE BODY BUT NOT YOUR SON.

OHH ABOUT JUSTIN HE STILL THINK ONE DAY HE HAS A FUTURE WITH BRITNEY SO IS MAKING SURE TO HAVE SOME SEEDS HERE.

PERSONNELY I DO GIVE A DOAMN ABOUT BOTH OF THEM.

Reply

Dumbness Hater October 25, 2005 at 10:08 pm

You know when you pay for their music cds and their movies, you’re not paying for the right to shine a light in every corner of their lives.

This is beyond ridiculous, this is almost obscene. How these magazines are allowed to do all this is beyond me. Whats worse is the attitude the viewing people have here in the US. Its absolutely sickening.

How would you like photos of your baby published in a magazine, oh wait but nobody pays for your music and ur movies. I do thank god for that.

Be respectful of others. Losers.

Reply

hjgkh@hkjs.com October 26, 2005 at 7:08 am

I’d still do her, even though she resembles a screaming pig in the top photo.

Reply

Hater Dumness October 26, 2005 at 7:16 am

Well, I’m all for her and her homies privacy, but how private is a magazine? She’s just pissed because missed the first chance to turn her son into the next olsen twin. If she was so concerned with privacy, then she shouldn’t be selling thoes pictures to a fucking magazine. I have 5 children, and I’m not worried about thier photos comming up missing, because I keep them private, and not for magazines to show them to the world.

Reply

Rebecca October 26, 2005 at 9:29 am

mmm, i think everyone should got their privacy, it just like everyone got a secret, a something that a person feel sepcial and not ready to show or to do it. Everyoen got a exception, and i think there’s no exception on britney , she’s a singer, but except this, she still a normal person, as us, has a husband , has a child, no difference. Why this magazine just can’t let her enjoy this great time to being as a new mummy???

Reply

ipf October 26, 2005 at 11:47 am

oh dear

Reply

Steph October 26, 2005 at 5:40 pm

I think Britney is acting like a ‘baby’ herself with these photos. I mean really, who cares. Making SUCH a huge FUSS over this. Is it cause she didn’t PAID for the photos on the internet. She said herself she didn’t want to sell out her baby. WHAT!? to why then is she getting paid LOTS of money to publish them.

Reply

Stephanie November 25, 2005 at 2:01 am

I think she has the right to flip about her baby’s picture being put out like that, because that is no body’s buisness but, Kevin’s and Britney’s.But, that is just my personal opinion. This time the media went way too far.

Reply

AARON December 6, 2005 at 1:21 am

WHO CARES ABOUT SOME FUCKING PICTURES OF HER SON. SHE SHOW MORE OF HER THAN PEOPLE REALLY WANT TO SEE SO WHATS THE BIG DEAL.

Reply

Bella August 4, 2006 at 9:42 pm

Why is Justin all of a sudden backing her up? Did he forget she cheated on him with hottie Wade Robson? Um okay. Britney is immature and she married Kevin all in a rush because she felt lonely and she had noone interesting in her life. She woulda been way happier with Justin but its all FAITH and maybe her FAITH wasn’t meant to be with him. Cameron is too old for Justin honestly. Can you imagine her in 10 years how she’ll look? Same goes for Ashton Kutcher? They are being idiots going for these older women because sooner or later those old women are asking to get cheated on because they will realize they married their grannies and will cheat on their wives and then another divorce on the tabloids lol. I can predit HOLLYWOOD soooooooooooooooo good.

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: