hecklerspray Saves The Children From Violent 50 Cent Poster

by Stuart Heritage on October 28, 2005 4 Comments

50_centYesterday we reported that residents of LA were up in arms because there was a giant poster of 50 Cent holding a gun near a school in a high-crime section of the city.

Well, it looks like some high-ranking Paramount people are hecklerspray readers, because since our article was published, the offending poster – for forthcoming movie Get Rich Or Die Tryin‘ -  has been removed. Another victory for hecklerspray!*

Activists were calling the poster for the new 50 Cent (CDs) movie Get Rich
Or Die Tryin’ "irresponsible,"
as it showed a large picture of the
rapper with his arms outstretched – a gun in one hand and a microphone
in the other. The posters were displayed near a school in a district of
the city that had recently mounted an anti-gang campaign.

In a letter
to Paramount studios, Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael Antonovich
wrote:

"This billboard conveys to the students a disturbing message actively
promoting gun violence, criminal behaviour and gang affiliation."

50 Cent, meanwhile, can’t see what all the fuss is about:

"There are different standards in the music industry. I’ve seen pistols
pointed straight at people in movie posters before, but because it’s 50
Cent, it’s different.”

*Or a victory for actual campaigners, at least – we didn’t really care if the posters stayed
or went.

Read more:

50 Cent’s billboards yanked after protests – ABC

[story by Stuart Heritage]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Fitim Pacolli October 29, 2005 at 2:06 pm

YH SHADY AFTERMATH GG GG UNIT –i think that is a gr8 poster of 50
50CENT iz da man, is da gangsta, HAHAAHA G UNIT

Reply

Fitim Pacolli October 29, 2005 at 2:14 pm

YH SHADY AFTERMATH GG GG UNIT –i think that is a gr8 poster of 50
50CENT iz da man, is da gangsta, HAHAAHA G UNIT

Reply

poster2 October 31, 2005 at 5:34 pm

once wasn’t enuf? you had to post your drivel twice?

Reply

JBollocks September 19, 2007 at 9:15 am

poster2, in Fitim Pacolli’s defense, I had to read it twice to understand what the hell he was trying to say.

and I’m still not sure.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: