Comments on: Everyone Is Wrong: The Big Bang

By: Gerald Whitely

Gerald Whitely — Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:48:28 +0000

So Matt, if the Big Bang is too strange to take seriously, how do you think the universe (and us) got here? We are here. Are mater and energy eternal? If matter and energy had a beginning, what brought them forth from nothing? And where did the laws of the universe come from? When or from Whom did they come? Although belief in God may seem illogical, it is the only logical theory left standing. I am like “readquran”, in that I believe the Bible as authoritative (not the quran). But again, this is not a blind leap in the dark, nor the result of brainwashing, but logical testable faith. What are your theories, Matt?
Gerald Whitely

By: Matt Watts

Matt Watts — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:11:03 +0000

I “knew” the big bang theory was too strange to take seriously when I first heard of it in the 8th Grade in 1964, but instead of it disappearing it just has gotten stronger over time. The psychology, religion, and politics behind the tyranny of this popular myth is much more interesting than the simple primordial seed in nothingness theory itself.
It is like a Genesis Plot or brain washing system.
Why things change so slowly and such mythology persists is just bizarre to me.
That’s just part of what humanity is and does I suppose. But it is changing and the world wide web is helping a great deal to educate people and to spread creative thinking and real live logic.
Thanks for the heart warming blog.

By: readquran

readquran — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:01:14 +0000

i agree with you that the big bang Theory is wrong because according to Islam The Quran mentions:

“Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, then We separated them, and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?” (Quran 21:30) and there are man more reference

By: Gerald Whitely

Gerald Whitely — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:53:30 +0000

Dear Dustin,

Sounds like you are on the right track. Faith in God is not a leap in the dark, it is a reasonable faith. As we look at the complexity of the universe, and look at the complexity in the cell, there is no way that all of this could have made itself – even if you give it billions of years. There must be a Designer more intelligent than His creation, Greater than His entire creation, and, amazingly, desiring to make Himself known to us, His creation. Keep thinking!
Gerald Whitely
whitely@catt.com

By: Gerald Whitely

Gerald Whitely — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:42:23 +0000

Dear Nerdsrules,
It sounds like you prefer to live in ignorance. I do not believe in a “God” because I can’t explain a given phenomenon; I believe that God is the best explanation in cases where something was obviously made. We don’t discuss how a 1963 corvette evolved, because an engineer at GM is actually the best explanation. To assume materialism as the only explanation is to limit our choices. Consider all possibilities and then eliminate impossibilities one at a time. If God is left standing, so be it. I am not afraid of facts wherever they may lead. Are you, Nerdsrules?
Gerald Whitely
whitley@catt.com

By: Dustin

Dustin — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:34:21 +0000

I agree that the big bang theory is false, and I can prove that through Science itself:
Science states:
Everything has a beginning
Energy cannot be created or destroyed
Molecules are made of energy

now that we have those, lets look at this:

big bang theory says that there is the possibility of a series of big bangs leading up to this, so lets look at the first:

where did the gas and rock and whatever was there come from for there to even BE a big bang? Science can’t explain that, so for now, faith is the only thing that could be true, and which faith you choose could be right or wrong, but one thing is for sure, in the end, we will all know whose been right all along, and whose been dead wrong. my faith is in Yahweh(God), and that He made the universe, so, I guess when we die, we will see if my faith is correct or not, but I truly believe it is.

God Bless You,
Dustin R.

By: nerdsrules

nerdsrules — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:15:49 +0000

If you throw GOD in the middle of all this theory it all makes sense
after all it’s beyond our tiny little pea brains isn’t it
The universe if full of unexplained phenomenon we cant explain
its way beyond us
don’t be fooled there really is a GOD

By: DarkClow

DarkClow — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:43:47 +0000

hi there again after a year or two but again you are avoiding stuff we already know big bang’s/ super nova’s and all have been proven by nasa and other astrophysics’s. please take your time and read websites and real things not people that belive they seen green aliens and gave them stuff (not saying they not real but i havent seen any and i am in a hot spot zone for them) but super nova’s create such force that everything in so much raduis is gone but the main core witch turns into a sun again in so many million years but then comets and other stuff head into its gravity pull around it and smash into the debris to create planets and moon’s please search this up has its not a thoery

By: Rob H

Rob H — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:57:28 +0000

<>
But I’ve talked with physicists who confirmed that there’s also a shock-wave which reflects back inward faster than the expansion. In that case you’d see all kinds of things happening in the fractions of Femtoseconds which I imagine causing resonances and rhythms (remember there are rhythms in harmonies!!!).
Imagine what would occur when the first inward shockwave reached the point of origin. Wouldn’t the collision of energies be an extremely important interval and then cause yet more outward wavefronts which themselves would have inwards fronts as well?
So much complexity and information in such an unimaginably short, energetic moment – fixed by the sudden entropic cooling so that the principals of creative elaboration would be forged probably for all time or close to it.

I prefer to keep my mind on things like this rather than giving up and letting someone else dictate their stories to me…

By: Gerald Whitely

Gerald Whitely — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:43:01 +0000

Dear Jeff G. and Wayne W. and others reading,

Thanks for your interest and input. It sounds like you, Jeff are not a believer in the Big Bang at all. What DO you believe about origins? And you, Wayne, are not sure what is going on, but the Big Bang is not very explanative. Again, what DO you believe about the Origin of the Universe?
The interesting thing about the Big Bang theory is that if you do the math (Silk, Weinberg and Hawking), there is still not enough expansion to fill the 15 billion light years diameter of the universe that we can (with the Hubble telescope) see! This necessitates Alan Guth’s Expansion theory. But this “expansion theory” that has to be added to the Big Bang theory is actually not merely an expansion, but another explosion (a second stage Big Bang). So . . .
If the Big Bang can’t explain the universe that we CAN see, how is it even a viable theory? It isn’t. Dr. Russell Humphreys used Einstein’s same formulas (special and general Relativity) using 6,000 years instead of infinity, and using a White Hole concept (the opposite of a Black hole) the Heavens could have been created 6,000 years ago and then “stretched out” (as mentioned in Psalms) according to the space/time/velocity principle.
Google Humphrey’s book – an alternative to the bankrupt Big Bang.

Gerald Whitely whitely@catt.com

By: Wayne Walls

Wayne Walls — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:48:44 +0000

My view is that we must have emerged from something…what that is well who can really say? Given the fact the Universe is expanding, it does suggest the Big Bang as it is called, there is still the HUGE question of what initiated the event? Maybe that is a question too mired in philosophy or even religion, with its metaphysical edge obvious to all…theology is another stage on which it seems best able to perform…

There is also the question of what happened “before” the big-bang, which itself is a question really of metaphysics, its almost like trying to visualise the world befoer you yourself were born…

The essence of the big bang is that everything emerged from a singular point, in effect from “nothing”…now try to grasp that point for a moment or two, hmmmm, very difficult isn’t it? In fact it’s impossible for the human brain to fully comprehend the essence of that idea, because obviously we cannot view infinite dimensional objects, or even four-dimensional ones. As they say, just think of it like a balloon, with dots on the surface, expanding out…

I am to understand the big bang did not occur in a central point, it happened everywhere at the same time, which again is impossible for us mere mortals to grasp…

Just by way of concluding, I too feel the big bang theory is hugely incomplete, and there really is a lot that is to still be learnt about it, as there is still the dichotomy between relativity and quantum theory, of course string theory is one of the tools currently in use to try to decipher the sub-microscopc universe, wih there seemingly being a way to maybe one day incorporate relativity into the quantum realm with quantum gravity being investigated so thoroughly, all they need to try is to see how far they can go with these fields of endeavour…time will tell of course.

By: Jeff G

Jeff G — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:29:54 +0000

I so love it when people run off at the mouth without doing the research. It only serves to discredit them from the get go. What I bet Shawn didn’t know before he wrote this is that the “quack” who “dreamed up” the big bang theory (apparently while “scrubbing his nethers in a bubble bath”) was Georges Lemaître, a Belgian Roman Catholic priest, honorary prelate and professor of physics and astronomer at the Catholic University of Leuven.

Keep it coming. You’re ravings provide me with much amusement.

By: Gerald Whitely

Gerald Whitely — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:37:08 +0000

Dear gir & Shooty & etc.,

If you are sick of my stupid mythological theory, please state your own theory – but it must be “science” i.e. measurable and observable. Feel free to slander and use expletives, but always realize that a personal attack is evidence of a weak point. If one can not discuss a subject intelligently, of course, personal attacks are all that is available. This is not about me; this is about scientific facts. I tried to use some; how about you, gir? Give me something to discuss, not just personal attacks.

Gerald Whitely
whitely@catt.com

By: Shooty*

Shooty* — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:27:22 +0000

Christ, how did I miss this thread?

You leave gir alone!

By: gir

gir — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:10:57 +0000

“Once again, the theory left standing is a Creator Who is 1. outside of time 2. before origins 3. more intelligent than all that we can opserve 4. the Owner of everything – including us.”

One last time: THAT IS NOT A FUCKING THEORY YOU FUCKING RETARD. Do not try to pretend that your idiot mythology has some scientific validity.