<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awesome Or Off-Putting: Britain&#8217;s Invisible Tanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php</link>
	<description>Grown Up Gossip &#38; Internet Villainy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:16:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesome Or Off-Putting: Britain&#8217;s Invisible Tanks &#171; Xenophilia (True Strange Stuff)</title>
		<link>http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php/comment-page-1#comment-386326</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesome Or Off-Putting: Britain&#8217;s Invisible Tanks &#171; Xenophilia (True Strange Stuff)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php#comment-386326</guid>
		<description>[...] If a camera breaks mid-battle, or a projector just fails, thatâ€™s it. The competitive edge provided by an invisible tank is all but lost. The man behind this all, one Professor Sir John Pendry, knows this and he has a plan: â€œThe next stage is to make the tank invisible without [the cameras and projectors] - which is intricate and complicated, but possible.â€  Whatâ€™s more - the same technology could be used to make jackets for the soldier himself. Source: HSpray [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If a camera breaks mid-battle, or a projector just fails, thatâ€™s it. The competitive edge provided by an invisible tank is all but lost. The man behind this all, one Professor Sir John Pendry, knows this and he has a plan: â€œThe next stage is to make the tank invisible without [the cameras and projectors] &#8211; which is intricate and complicated, but possible.â€  Whatâ€™s more &#8211; the same technology could be used to make jackets for the soldier himself. Source: HSpray [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britain&#8217;s Invisible Tank &#171; The Keelynet Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php/comment-page-1#comment-384097</link>
		<dc:creator>Britain&#8217;s Invisible Tank &#171; The Keelynet Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php#comment-384097</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by keelynet on February 19, 2008  Predator lives! &#8220;A soldier who&#8217;s seen it first-hand says: &#8220;This technology is incredible. If I hadn&#8217;t been present I wouldn&#8217;t have believed it. I looked across the fields and just saw grass and trees - but in reality I was staring down the barrel of a tank gun.&#8221; As we understand it, the technology involves a whole bunch of cameras and projectors. The surrounding area is filmed, then projected onto the tank&#8217;s other side. It seems then, that &#8216;invisible&#8217; may not be the right word. Perhaps &#8216;perfectly camouflaged&#8217; would suit things better. We don&#8217;t care though, the headline stays. If a camera breaks mid-battle, or a projector just fails, that&#8217;s it. The competitive edge provided by an invisible tank is all but lost. The man behind this all, one Professor Sir John Pendry, knows this and he has a plan: &#8220;The next stage is to make the tank invisible without [the cameras and projectors] - which is intricate and complicated, but possible.&#8221; What&#8217;s more - the same technology could be used to make jackets for the soldier himself. This of course means an invisible soldier could emerge from an invisible tank and wreak absolute havoc on the guy with the war-donkey we talked about earlier.&#8221; - Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by keelynet on February 19, 2008  Predator lives! &#8220;A soldier who&#8217;s seen it first-hand says: &#8220;This technology is incredible. If I hadn&#8217;t been present I wouldn&#8217;t have believed it. I looked across the fields and just saw grass and trees &#8211; but in reality I was staring down the barrel of a tank gun.&#8221; As we understand it, the technology involves a whole bunch of cameras and projectors. The surrounding area is filmed, then projected onto the tank&#8217;s other side. It seems then, that &#8216;invisible&#8217; may not be the right word. Perhaps &#8216;perfectly camouflaged&#8217; would suit things better. We don&#8217;t care though, the headline stays. If a camera breaks mid-battle, or a projector just fails, that&#8217;s it. The competitive edge provided by an invisible tank is all but lost. The man behind this all, one Professor Sir John Pendry, knows this and he has a plan: &#8220;The next stage is to make the tank invisible without [the cameras and projectors] &#8211; which is intricate and complicated, but possible.&#8221; What&#8217;s more &#8211; the same technology could be used to make jackets for the soldier himself. This of course means an invisible soldier could emerge from an invisible tank and wreak absolute havoc on the guy with the war-donkey we talked about earlier.&#8221; &#8211; Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h</title>
		<link>http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php/comment-page-1#comment-378159</link>
		<dc:creator>h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php#comment-378159</guid>
		<description>yeah, maybe we can sell em to the yanks and they can invade grenada again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, maybe we can sell em to the yanks and they can invade grenada again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britainâ€™s Invisible Tanks &#124; SUPERNATURAL NEWS</title>
		<link>http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php/comment-page-1#comment-377989</link>
		<dc:creator>Britainâ€™s Invisible Tanks &#124; SUPERNATURAL NEWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hecklerspray.com/awesome-or-off-putting-britains-invisible-tanks/200812372.php#comment-377989</guid>
		<description>[...] From Shawn Lindseth hecklerspray.com: If Wonder Woman was smart, she&#8217;d use her invisible-jet technology to make an airline. Tremendous success would be unavoidable - everybody would have a window seat, and the guess work involved in the aeroplane bathroom would be more entertaining than the in-flight movie. And extremely public. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Shawn Lindseth hecklerspray.com: If Wonder Woman was smart, she&#8217;d use her invisible-jet technology to make an airline. Tremendous success would be unavoidable &#8211; everybody would have a window seat, and the guess work involved in the aeroplane bathroom would be more entertaining than the in-flight movie. And extremely public. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

